Home » Blog » Why Your MVP Doesn’t Need a Custom-Built Text Editor

Why Your MVP Doesn’t Need a Custom-Built Text Editor

You just got your first investment. Your team is excited, the roadmap looks promising, and then someone says, “Let’s build our own text editor. It’ll be perfect for what we need.”

This is the moment to slow down.

Building a text editor from scratch is one of the most common and expensive mistakes early-stage founders make. It looks simple, but it quickly turns into months of hard work that uses up time, money, and energy.

While you spend weeks fixing things like cursor movement and undo buttons, your competitors are already testing their product and talking to real users.

The truth is, your MVP doesn’t need a custom-built text editor. An HTML-rich text editor like Froala, TinyMCE, or CKEditor is almost always the better choice for early products.

In this guide, we’ll walk through the key things you should know before deciding.

Key Takeaways

Custom text editors take 3–6 months to build properly and pull your team away from important product features.
HTML-rich text editors work right away and can be set up in hours instead of months.
Most startups don’t need custom editor features when they are still finding product-market fit.
Using ready-made tools saves money and helps you improve faster based on user feedback.
You can always build a custom editor later, once you know users want it and you have more time and resources.

Now that you know the key points, let’s look at why building your own editor comes with so many hidden costs.

The Hidden Cost of Building Your Own Text Editor

When founders think about building a text editor, they often imagine it’s a quick weekend task. But in reality, text editors are much more complex than they look.

Here’s what you are actually getting into:

The Real Work Behind It

A working, production-ready text editor needs things like:

Dealing with contentEditable issues in different browsers
Keeping track of the cursor and text selection
Adding undo and redo functionality
Supporting keyboard shortcuts
Handling pasted content from Word, Google Docs, and other apps
Managing inline styles and block-level formatting
Making sure it’s accessible
Working well on mobile
Supporting collaborative editing (if needed)

Even experienced engineers underestimate how hard this is. What looks like a two-week task often becomes months of work. Meanwhile, your money goes down, and your main features get pushed back.

What You Lose by Doing This

And the cost isn’t just technical. Every hour spent on a text editor is an hour you don’t spend on things that actually grow your product, like:

Talking to customers
Improving the main value of your product
Building features that make your product stand out
Testing your business idea
Growing your user base

As Y Combinator consistently advises, early-stage startups should focus on building something people actually want, not on polishing tools that don’t matter early on.

McKinsey’s Developer Velocity research shows that companies with strong developer tools are 65% more innovative than those at the bottom. The main point is clear: the best teams don’t waste engineering time rebuilding basic tools. They focus on what makes their product different.

This is where the smarter option comes in.

When an HTML Rich Text Editor is the Right Choice

An HTML-rich text editor is a ready-made tool that already handles text editing for you. It’s like using Stripe instead of building your own payment system; it just makes more sense.

If you’re still finding product-market fit, an HTML-rich text editor is almost always the best choice because it helps you:

Ship quickly and start learning from users
Save engineering time for important features
Stay flexible as your product changes
Avoid heavy maintenance work

According to TinyMCE’s 2023 State of Rich Text Editors survey of over 1,100 professionals, more than half of developers prefer using a ready-made editor, and only about a quarter choose to build their own.

The ones who do build custom usually work at companies where text editing is the main product, not just a small feature.

Using a pre-built editor gives you everything you need for your MVP without slowing you down.

Now let’s look at how easy it is to set one up.

Implementing a Simple HTML Rich Text Editor

To show how quick the setup can be, here’s an example using Froala, but there are many other HTML-rich text editors you can choose from.

<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<meta charset=”utf-8″ />
<title>MVP Editor</title>

<!– Include Froala CSS –>
<link
href=”<https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/froala-editor@latest/css/froala_editor.pkgd.min.css>”
rel=”stylesheet”
/>
</head>
<body>
<!– Your editor container –>
<div id=”editor”></div>

<!– Include Froala JavaScript –>
<script src=”<https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/froala-editor@latest/js/froala_editor.pkgd.min.js>”></script>

<!– Initialise Froala –>
<script>
// Simple initialisation
new FroalaEditor(“#editor”, {
// Basic toolbar options
toolbarButtons: [
“bold”,
“italic”,
“underline”,
“|”,
“formatOL”,
“formatUL”,
“|”,
“insertLink”,
],

// Set height
heightMin: 300,

// Placeholder text
placeholderText: “Start writing your content…”,
});
</script>
</body>
</html>

What this code does:

Loads Froala’s CSS and JavaScript from a CDN
Creates a <div> that becomes your editor
Starts the editor with basic tools like bold, italic, underline, lists, and links
Sets a minimum height for comfortable writing
Adds simple placeholder text to guide the user

And that’s it. With just a few lines of code, you get a fully working text editor that’s more than enough for an MVP.

It surprises a lot of founders how quickly they can ship an editor this way.

Naturally, the next question becomes: when does it actually make sense to build a custom editor?

When Should You Build a Custom Editor?

There are times when building your own editor makes sense, but these usually come much later, not during your MVP.

When It Makes Sense to Build Custom:

You’ve raised Series A or more and have enough engineering help.
Text editing is your main product (like Notion, Google Docs, or Grammarly).
You’ve found product-market fit, and users are asking for special editing features.
You need very advanced features that no existing editor can provide.

Signs You’re Building Too Early:

You haven’t launched yet.
You have fewer than 10 paying customers.
Your engineers think they have “extra time” (they don’t, use it for user research).
Your reason is “it would be cool to have this”.
You’re comparing your MVP to products that took years to build.

As Paul Graham explains in his essays, doing too much too early is a common reason startups fail. Build the simplest version first, then improve it based on what real users need.

Now that you know when you shouldn’t build a custom editor, the next step is learning how to use a ready-made one the right way.

Best Practices for Using HTML Rich Text Editors in Your MVP

When using a rich text editor in your MVP, keeping things simple will help you move fast and avoid extra work. Here are a few easy tips to follow:

1. Start Minimal

Don’t enable every feature just because it exists. For your MVP:

Use only basic formatting like bold, italic, and lists.
Add extra features only if you truly need them.
Keep the toolbar clean and simple.

You can always add more features later based on user feedback.

2. Plan for Mobile Users

Most HTML-rich text editors work on mobile by default, but you should still test on real devices to make sure the experience feels smooth.

3. Set Reasonable Limits

Add limits to prevent slowdowns or heavy resource use as your MVP grows.

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

Here are a few mistakes that many teams make when working with rich text editors, and how you can avoid them.

1. Customising Too Early

Many teams spend weeks changing how the editor looks and works before launch. Start with the default settings and only make changes when users ask for them.

2. Skipping Content Security

Saving user HTML without cleaning it can create security problems. Always sanitize the HTML on the backend.

3. Not Planning for Migration

Using special or locked formats can trap you later. Saving content as HTML makes it easy to switch editors or add new features.

4. Ignoring Mobile Testing

Something that works well on a desktop might not work on a phone. Test the editor on real mobile devices to avoid touch-related issues.

Conclusion

Your MVP works only when you understand what your users really need. If you spend your time building a custom text editor, you lose time that could be spent learning from real users.

An HTML-rich text editor like Froala gives you all the basic editing features in just a few hours instead of months. It helps you save money, move faster, and keep your team focused on the parts of your product that truly matter.

Your text editor isn’t what makes your product special. What truly matters is how well you solve your users’ problems. That’s why it’s better to use an HTML-rich text editor for your MVP, launch quickly, and start learning from real users. You can always build custom features later, once you’re sure people actually need them.

So start building today. Pick a reliable HTML-rich text editor, set it up this week, and stay focused on what matters most: finding product-market fit and building a strong, lasting business.

About the Author

Shefali Jangid is a web developer, technical writer, and content creator with a love for building intuitive tools and resources for developers.

She writes about web development, shares practical coding tips on her blog shefali.dev, and creates projects that make developers’ lives easier.

Resources for Further Reading

Note: Some images in this article may be AI-generated.